Airbus VS Boeing

Airbus VS Boeing Airbus VS Boeing.pptx 목차 Airbus VS Boeing Q&A 1 Q&A 2 Q&A 3 Q&A 4 Q&A 5 본문 1992EU & U.S. Trade in Large Civil Aircraft, which restricted EU governments to providing direct support Boeing agreed that any indirect aid from the U.S. Department of Defense And other government sources would be capped at 4% of its annual revenues . . Q1. Where do you stand? Do you think EU subsidies and soft loans to Airbus are fair? Why or why not? What advantages does Airbus gain from free financial support from the EU governments? Are complaints about EU subsidies fair in light of Europe’s history of democratic socialism? A1. In order to protect domestic industries, EU subsidies for Airbus was required. Subsidies was essential to prevent Boeings monopoly, because Boeing was head- start in Air bus and Boeings monopoly industry. if free market without the intervention of the government had been, Boeing would have been monopoly company. iF Air bus got government subsides, profits can be gained with participating in Airbus aircraft production. 본문내용 g : When is intervention not intervention? Dominant player in global aircraft manufacturing 1960s Airbus VS Boeing Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q5 Boeing was the recipient of many contracts from the U.S. Department of Defense 1960S W.W.Ⅱ & Cold War 1970 1992 1981 Q1 Airbus VS Boeing Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 1960S W.W.Ⅱ & Cold War 1970 1992 France & Germany formed an alliance, to create Airbus S.A.S 1981 Q1 Airbus VS Boeing